[nSLUG] PVR systems
draker at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 01:17:45 AST 2011
On 11 February 2011 00:09, Ted Tibbetts <intuited at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that ext3, even with
> journaling enabled, will normally run a periodic fsck based on elapsed time
Yes. Elapsed time or number of mounts since last check. Both can be
disabled. Or use xfs, which doesn't have a traditional fsck, and can
check the filesystem while mounted (read-only). Read-only small root
filesystem is a good idea, as is putting it on flash.
OK, you've suckered me into to starting to read the MythTV
documentation. I smiled to find that in the 'filesystem' section, the
use of xfs or jfs is "<i>strongly</i> encouraged". FAT and reiserfs
are discouraged. ext3 is acceptable with a workaround.
> Daniel, thanks for the tip about the Shuttle. It's not quite the right form
> factor, though -- I think my target recipient would prefer something more
> vcr-shaped that could fit into the limited height of the cabinet space under
> the TV, especially if the thing has a DVD slot. Also, it seems like a P4,
> in addition to being hot, and thereby presumably loud, might not be able to
> deal with the demands of HD. My Pentium M 1.4GHz laptop is a bit too slow
> to play compressed 1080p video without dropping frames.
The MythTV wiki talks about using a P4 2.4GHz minimum for HDTV
playback. You also need a fast CPU for encoding, unless you buy a
hardware encoder card. So the hardware isn't cheap. I think it would
probably cheaper to buy a non-free sw PVR appliance. I assumed your
primary motivation for this project was not financial...
> Of course much of
> this depends on how much work is done by the video card(s);
Yes, the docs also mention that an Atom CPU with the nVidia Ion
chipset and nVidia's proprietary binary drivers is able to play HDTV.
Together with a hardware capture card, that would make a nice
> the laptop has a
> lustreless old intel craphics chip. I noticed that one of the four Shuttles
> has an Athlon 64 CPU; I'm not sure how they compare to the P4.
Of course both the P4 and Athlon 64 come in a wide range of speeds,
cache sizes, etc. but I would say the Athlon 64 measures up well.
For a more "VCR-like" form factor, the Compaq Evo series might be
right. These are both P4 systems for ~$100, and happen to be in
For something local, and more expensive but requiring less upgrades, see this:
OK, I think that's about all the info I can collect. Oh, one more...
Commercial MythTV sellers:
More information about the nSLUG