[nSLUG] Measured wattage of atom system

Jason Kenney jdkenney at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 12:38:59 ADT 2008

I guess you misunderstood - my comments were directed at the choice of
keeping the PIII until now, not making a switch now.

Frankly I don't think power consumption should ever be a consideration
for a home computer system.  The effort you spend considering it could
be more effectively spent finding other ways to reduce expenses in
your life.  The 100W figure is even extreme, if the difference is only
30W, you're now down to what? 7 cents a day?  I'm pretty you "throw
away" significantly more money than that every time you drive your car
by being a far from optimal driver for example.


On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Gregory <nslug at kernelpanic.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:03:55PM -0300, Jason Kenney wrote:
>> Because it's not "throwing away money" if you are getting value for
>> it.
> Agreed.
>> It just strikes me as very odd that someone who is into
>> computers so much would place such a low value on their own
>> experience.
> If the Atom is being used to replace two old systems it is likely
> overkill for what is required. When all the requirements for a system
> are met by an Atom system then the only criteria left to judge the
> systems is power consumption.1
> It strikes me as very odd the someone who is into computers so much
> would not want a small lower power home server.
> --
> sg
> _______________________________________________
> nSLUG mailing list
> nSLUG at nslug.ns.ca
> http://nslug.ns.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nslug

More information about the nSLUG mailing list