[nSLUG] OT: top/bottom posts and trimming [was: Does Anyone Recognise This Guy's Phone Number]
tyler.smith at mail.mcgill.ca
Tue Mar 11 10:30:28 ADT 2008
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:31:45AM -0300, Jeff Warnica wrote:
> It is far more common that people read individual messages in the
> sending order, as they arrive, and thus, older (quoted) messages are
> included as a reference and not meant to be the primary source. If the
> reader needs the reference, they can scroll down; but the assumption
> when writing should be that your reader is paying attention
Fair enough, and I wouldn't complain if a reply is posted immediately
above a trimmed version of the message it is responding to. What I've
observed on occasion on nslug, however, is a top-posted response to a
bottom-post response, which in turn was responding to a top-post. This
forces readers to scroll down and up repeatedly to regain the sense of
the thread. All the more so when the response is a one-line answer
that makes no sense without knowing exactly what it was referring to.
> - and forcing everyone to read (or at least scroll) through what
> they already know is just a bad idea.
Which gets us back to the idea of trimming, which in combination with
bottom-posting makes for the most readable posts. And I still maintain
that mixing top and bottom posting makes for unreadable posts.
Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.
More information about the nSLUG