[nSLUG] Re: Redhat and minimal X-less install
mspencer at tallships.ca
Wed Dec 13 01:41:52 AST 2006
> The I installed slapt-get and used hat to upgrade to Slack-11. Bad
> things started to happen -- like for example, the "groff" package
> contains, among other things, "gxditview", which is linked against X
> libs, so the whole package "depends" on X. Of course it really
> doesn't, just one part of it which one wouldn't try use in a no-X
Isn't taxonomy a lovely problem? gxditview obviously belongs in some
kind of X-utilities package. Except that it isn't obvious, of course,
to anyone who happens not to think about the right aspects. I was
just thinking about this today because I was in John Doull's book shop
looking for a book recommended to me but about which I knew nothing
but the title & author. The book I was looking for might have
classified in any of JD's Literature, Thrillers, Detective, SciFi or
Teen/Youth sections, depending on what the guy doing intake had for
breakfast that day, POTM etc.
I suppose the answer is to spend a few (for variable values of "few")
hours putting together YASPLD  that has exactly what you need
packaged in just the way you like it.
Ho hum. :-)
> But then, this whole "package dependency" thing is still pretty new to
> Slackware :)
I haven't encountered that yet. My last upgrade was from Slak 8 to
Slak 10.1. The upgrade utility didn't grok Slak 8, only Slak 9 so I
had to do it, so to speak, by hand anyhow.
 Yet Another Special Purpose Linux Distro
Michael Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada .~.
mspencer at tallships.ca /( )\
More information about the nSLUG