[nSLUG] On topic of favorite distros, and Linux on the Desktop
jeffw at chebucto.ns.ca
Mon Mar 1 22:56:07 AST 2004
I think this is the major distinction between the GNU "Free Software"
and the OSI "Open Source" camps. GNU is a political movement with
philosophic goals. OSI is pragmatic, pushing the theory that Open Source
methodologies produce better systems, and that many OSS packages are
better then their closed source competitors.
Since I have no money, no job (and thus, no budget), zero cost is a Good
Thing. I'm not really a programmer, but being able to make minor
fixes is a Good Thing. But I'm more then willing to use NVidia's
drivers, help RedHat by running FC, and personally produce unique,
closed source code. And I'm more then prepared to personally buy, or
recommend to others to buy closed source systems if they happen to be
better then some OSS/Free alternative.
 though I play one in real life, disliking it only slightly less then
menial unskilled labour
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 21:46, Jamie Fifield wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:02:21PM -0400, Donald Teed wrote:
> > The attitudes have to change from elitist to
> > community oriented. Defending one's gauntlet
> > should be limited to game playing.
> > Plurality of view is needed to see the obstacles
> > others face. Answering the question as if you are
> > the only user in the world will not cut it.
> You are assuming that everyone is interested in Linux advocacy. I am
> the only Linux user in the world that I have time to care about.
> I'm not discouraging you from feeling however you want to, I'm just
> raising an alternate point of view.
More information about the nSLUG