[nSLUG] HRM wants to try online voting
milesthompson at ns.sympatico.ca
Wed Jan 14 16:34:25 AST 2004
The last thing HRM has to get involved with is any form of electronic
voting. Paper works, is simple, and reliable.
If there's low turnout that is probably a reflection of the quality of the
candidates. (Or does something happen to their brains once elected?) If
they are truly concerned, they need their workers to get people out to the
Guess that was a rant - Miles
PS It's probably worse here in East Hants, you may not even get a leaflet
that describes the candidate. Sigh.
At 01:54 PM 1/14/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 02:35, Jason Kenney wrote:
> > > >The current (paper) system can be understood by anyone. I don't think
> > > >any kind of automated system could be made simple enough to be
> > > >understood by just anyone... The standard that (should) applies to
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I agree. I heard just today on the CBC about a
> > > computerized voting system that relies on optical reading technology.
> > I don't see the point of an OCR system.
>I was speaking specifically of the vague idea proposed by an HRM
>concealer. City elections have horrible turnout, an online election
>might help, ORC wont.
>Besides, if we want to use paper in a way easily countable by machines,
>and also verifiable by people, Im sure we could get a good deal on used
>machines from Florida. (I think the problem there was the UI of the
>machine, not the machine itself (Well, and the law..). As I recently
>posted to /., the Nazis used punch cards to help orchestrate the
>Holocaust. Punch cards work.)
>nSLUG mailing list
>nSLUG at nslug.ns.ca
More information about the nSLUG